The Effect of Swedish Tethers on the Performance of Rear Facing Child Restraints in Frontal Crashes

نویسندگان

  • Chris Sherwood
  • Yasmina Abdelilah
  • Jeff Crandall
چکیده

Rear Facing child restraints (RFCR) have various component designs which can couple the restraint to the vehicle. Swedish tethers, which link the upper portion of the child restraint to the vehicle floor, prevent rearward rotation in rear impacts and during rebound in frontal crashes. They also simplify installation of restraints by allowing better control of the installation angle and removing the need of spacer devices. The objective of this study was to test the effect of Swedish tethers on RFCR in frontal crashes. The tethers reduced forward excursion and rotation, and had a positive but minor effect on injury values. The more secure attachment to the vehicle caused by the Swedish tether could also be beneficial in other crash types. INTRODUCTION The vehicle belt, lower LATCH belt, or ISOFix anchors serve as the primary components which attach Rear Facing Child Restraints (RFCR) to the vehicle. There are other devices, however, which can be used in addition to the primary components. Antirotation legs, Australian tethers, Swedish tethers, the ISOFix base, and anti-rebound bars are each designed to change the kinematics of the child restraint in different crash types. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 213, "Child restraint systems," requires RFCRs to meet the performance requirements of the standard when secured to the standard test seat assembly using (1) the lap belt only or (2) the lower LATCH (Lower Anchorages and Tethers for Children) anchorages only. NHTSA does not use a means supplemental to the lap belt/lower LATCH anchorages, such as a tether or a bar, of securing RFCR to the seat assembly in the agency's compliance test. In the past, NHTSA found that a very high percentage of parents did not use a supplemental tether strap to secure their child seats even when they knew the strap was needed to provide their child protection. The agency concluded that there was a strong likelihood that a tether or a bar would be misused with the seat, and that FMVSS No. 213 should thus require that child restraints must meet minimum requirements of the standard without supplemental tethers. Swedish tethers prevent rear rotation in rear impacts and during rebound in frontal impacts [1]. They link the upper portion of the child restraint to the vehicle floor, and may also have benefits in non-frontal crash types by more rigidly attaching the RFCR to the vehicle [2,3]. They can be attached to built-in anchor points or to the front seat base structure. The tether may reduce excursion in side impacts (lateral) and rollovers (upward/rearward). In addition to the effect it may have in vehicle crashes, the tether may also have benefits during installation. RFCRs have a recommended range of child restraint angles. The RFCR angle should be approximately 45 degrees (with respect to vertical), but no greater [3]. Since young children cannot hold their heads upright due to their weak neck musculature, the reclined angle prevents the head from flopping forward and cutting off the airway. At angles greater than 45 degrees, however, the child restraint provides less support for the head and neck. Variations in child restraint design, vehicle seat design, attachment equipment (LATCH, 3 pt belt), and the location of attachment anchors result in many RFCRs positioned at incorrect angles [4]. The most common method, which allows adjustment of the angle, is to place a spacer (typically rolled up towels or foam noodles) under the base of the RFCR near the seat back (Figure 1). Swedish tethers provide the opportunity to control and easily adjust this angle. Figure 1. Schematic of RFCR with spacer placed under base to correct installation angle.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Frontal sled tests comparing rear and forward facing child restraints with 1-3 year old dummies.

Although most countries recommend transitioning children from rear facing (RF) to forward facing (FF) child restraints at one year of age, Swedish data suggests that RF restraints are more effective. The objective of this study was to compare RF and FF orientations in frontal sled tests. Four dummies (CRABI 12 mo, Q1.5, Hybrid III 3 yr, and Q3) were used to represent children from 1 to 3 years ...

متن کامل

How Useful Are the Two Child Dummies in the Rear Seat of Ncap Testing?

This study aimed to investigate the utility of the responses of the two child dummies (P1.5 and P3) that are placed in the rear seat, in identical forwardfacing child restraints during frontal Australian NCAP (ANCAP) tests. Dynamic responses of the two child dummies, vehicle crash parameters, and frontal dummy responses were extracted from the ANCAP report database for 35 frontal crash tests. L...

متن کامل

Real World Analysis of Rear Seat Occupant Safety in Frontal Crashes

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) Vehicle Safety Rulemaking and Research Priority Plan 2009 – 2011 describes the projects the agency plans to work on in the rulemaking and research areas in those calendar years. Specific programs identified in the plan included research to improve vehicle safety for rear seat occupants, children, and older people. In support of the pr...

متن کامل

High levels of incorrect use of car seat belts and child restraints in Fife--an important and under-recognised road safety issue.

OBJECTIVE To pilot data collection instruments and to make a preliminary estimate of the level of incorrect use of car seat belts and child restraints in Fife, Scotland. DESIGN Cross sectional survey of cars containing adults and children at a number of public sites across Fife in 1995 to assess use of car occupant restraints. Trained road safety officers assessed whether seat restraints were...

متن کامل

New recommendations on motor vehicle safety for child passengers.

Despite significant reductions in the number of children killed in motor vehicle crashes over the past decade, these crashes continue to be the leading cause of death for children and adolescents older than three years in the United States.1 In 2010, more than 4,000 children and adolescents younger than 21 years died in motor vehicle crashes,2 and an additional 600,000 were injured.1 Promoting ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005